Partnerships with ComodoPay UK
ComodoPay UK may work with casino operators, payment-related services, software providers and other relevant organisations where a collaboration can improve the accuracy or usefulness of our content. Every partnership must preserve editorial independence and must not prevent us from explaining restrictions, costs or risks.
Partnership principles
A commercial arrangement does not give a partner ownership of editorial conclusions.
Independence comes first
ComodoPay UK retains control over:
- Page structure
- Research criteria
- Comparison categories
- Editorial language
- Publication timing
- Ranking methodology
- Corrections
- Removal of outdated content
A partner may provide factual material, but supplied claims are not automatically published.
Material conditions must remain visible
We will not hide significant information merely because it may reduce the appeal of an offer.
| Information that must remain clear | Examples |
|---|---|
| Payment limits | Minimum and maximum phone bill deposits |
| Payment restrictions | Account or eligibility conditions |
| Bonus exclusions | Payment methods that do not qualify |
| Wagering terms | Turnover and game restrictions |
| Withdrawal differences | Separate methods required to receive funds |
| Mobile billing effects | Charges added to or deducted from a mobile account |
| Responsible play risks | Overspending and delayed bill visibility |
| Availability limits | Geographic or technical restrictions |
Who may propose a collaboration
A proposal may come from an organisation connected to the subject of the site.
Potential partners can include:
| Partner category | Possible contribution |
|---|---|
| Casino operator | Confirmed payment and product information |
| Payment-related service | Explanation of transaction flow and limits |
| Game provider | Accurate slot and software details |
| Technology supplier | Mobile compatibility or security information |
| Editorial publisher | Relevant research or educational material |
| Responsible play organisation | General harm-prevention resources |
Submission of a proposal does not guarantee publication, placement or approval.
Types of partnership
Different collaborations require different levels of review.
Informational cooperation
This form of cooperation is limited to factual clarification.
It may include:
- Confirming whether a payment method is available
- Explaining a transaction step
- Updating published limits
- Correcting a technical description
- Confirming mobile compatibility
- Providing current bonus terms
Informational cooperation does not guarantee a link, ranking or positive conclusion.
Commercial referral arrangement
A referral arrangement may allow ComodoPay UK to receive compensation when an eligible visitor follows a link or completes a defined external action.
| Commercial element | ComodoPay UK position |
|---|---|
| Referral link | May be included where relevant |
| Fixed editorial praise | Not accepted |
| Guaranteed ranking | Not offered |
| Removal of restrictions | Not permitted |
| Approval before publication | Limited to factual corrections |
| Permanent placement | Not guaranteed |
| Performance-based compensation | Must not determine editorial conclusions |
Sponsored educational content
A sponsored contribution may be considered when it provides genuine informational value and is clearly distinguishable from independent editorial content.
Suitable subjects may include:
- How mobile billing works
- How to read payment limits
- Differences between deposits and withdrawals
- Mobile account security
- Avoiding unauthorised phone charges
- Responsible gambling controls
Purely promotional material without meaningful information may be rejected.
The partnership assessment process
Every proposal passes through several stages.
Stage A: relevance screening
The initial review asks whether the proposal fits the subject and audience of ComodoPay UK.
| Screening question | Reason |
|---|---|
| Is the service relevant to mobile casino payments? | Keeps partnerships within the site’s scope |
| Is the information useful to adult UK readers? | Protects audience relevance |
| Are key conditions available for review? | Prevents unsupported promotion |
| Can restrictions be presented openly? | Protects transparency |
| Is the proposal compatible with responsible play? | Avoids harmful positioning |
| Are claims specific enough to verify? | Supports accurate content |
A proposal may be declined when the product cannot be meaningfully assessed.
Stage B: information request
When a proposal passes screening, we may request structured information.
Partners may be asked to provide:
- Current product description
- Supported payment options
- Minimum and maximum deposit values
- Mobile account requirements
- Published transaction conditions
- Bonus eligibility information
- Withdrawal methods
- Mobile access details
- Responsible gambling features
- Date of the latest material update
No passwords, player records or unnecessary personal data should be submitted.
Stage C: verification and comparison
Submitted information is compared with publicly available material and existing content.
The review may identify:
- Matching information
- Missing conditions
- Conflicting descriptions
- Outdated promotional wording
- Unclear payment limits
- Important restrictions requiring explanation
Stage D: editorial decision
Possible outcomes include:
| Decision | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Accept for factual update | Existing content is corrected or expanded |
| Accept for editorial review | A broader analysis may be prepared |
| Accept with conditions | Publication requires clearer terms or disclosures |
| Hold for clarification | Important information remains incomplete |
| Decline | The proposal is unsuitable or insufficiently transparent |
| Remove from consideration | Later changes make the collaboration inappropriate |
Information partners should provide
A useful submission should be precise enough to support verification.
| Topic | Preferred information | Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile deposits | Current process, limits and account requirements | General claims such as “instant for everyone” |
| Bonuses | Full eligibility and wagering conditions | Headline value without restrictions |
| Slots | Categories, providers and mobile access | Unsupported claims of the “best games” |
| Security | User-facing controls and verification steps | Absolute claims of complete safety |
| Withdrawals | Available methods and published stages | Implying phone billing is automatically a withdrawal method |
| Availability | Clear eligibility conditions | Broad statements that every UK user is accepted |
| Support | Available help routes | Unverifiable response-time guarantees |
Editorial boundaries
Certain requests are incompatible with a partnership.
Requests we do not accept
ComodoPay UK will not agree to:
- Guarantee a top ranking
- Hide payment restrictions
- Remove responsible play information
- Describe paid deposits as free
- Promise successful withdrawals
- Present gambling as income
- Publish unverified customer claims as facts
- Invent licences or company details
- Target minors
- Encourage users to bypass payment limits
- Suppress a material correction
Claims requiring careful qualification
| Claim | Why qualification is needed |
|---|---|
| Instant deposit | Processing may depend on external systems |
| No fees | Other account or billing costs may exist |
| Best mobile casino | Depends on criteria and user needs |
| Secure payment | No payment system is entirely risk-free |
| Guaranteed bonus | Eligibility and terms may apply |
| Fast withdrawal | Processing can vary by account and method |
| Available in the UK | Access may depend on individual eligibility |
Placement and disclosure
Commercial links should be presented in a way that does not prevent readers from understanding their nature.
Placement does not equal endorsement
A commercial link may appear because a service is relevant to the topic, but readers should still review the platform’s own terms before creating an account or making a payment.
ComodoPay UK does not guarantee:
- Account acceptance
- Payment approval
- Bonus activation
- Withdrawal completion
- Continued availability
- A particular gambling result
Ranking changes
Positions may change when:
- Payment limits are revised
- Mobile usability improves or declines
- Bonus conditions change
- Important restrictions become clearer
- Responsible play tools are altered
- The platform is no longer relevant
- Better information becomes available
No partnership creates a permanent ranking.
Partner responsibilities after publication
A collaboration does not end when a page is published.
| Partner responsibility | ComodoPay UK responsibility |
|---|---|
| Report material changes | Review whether the page requires an update |
| Provide accurate factual corrections | Verify the requested correction |
| Avoid misleading promotional claims | Maintain balanced editorial wording |
| Identify expired offers | Remove or revise outdated details |
| Respect editorial independence | Keep commercial and editorial decisions separate |
| Protect user data | Avoid requesting unnecessary personal information |
Updating or ending a partnership
A partnership may be reviewed, paused or ended when:
- Information becomes materially inaccurate
- Important conditions are withheld
- The service changes substantially
- Promotional requests conflict with editorial policy
- Responsible play concerns emerge
- The commercial arrangement ends
- The content is no longer useful to readers
Existing content may be updated, repositioned or removed according to editorial relevance.
Submitting a proposal
A partnership enquiry can be sent through the contact form on the site.
A useful proposal should include:
- Organisation or service name
- Type of proposed collaboration
- Relevant payment information
- Suggested subject
- Current public supporting material
- Explanation of value to ComodoPay UK readers
Do not send player data, payment credentials or confidential account records.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Does paying for a partnership guarantee publication?
No. Every proposal is reviewed for relevance, transparency and editorial value.
Can a partner choose its ranking?
No. Rankings and comparison outcomes remain under the control of ComodoPay UK.
Can factual errors be corrected before publication?
Partners may identify factual inaccuracies, but final wording and editorial conclusions remain independent.
Does ComodoPay UK accept sponsored articles?
Sponsored educational content may be considered when it offers genuine value and is clearly distinguishable from independent analysis.
Can a partner request removal of negative information?
A partner may challenge information believed to be inaccurate. Accurate and relevant restrictions will not be removed merely because they are unfavourable.
How are expired bonuses handled?
Material changes can be reported through the contact form on the site. The relevant page may then be reviewed and updated.
Can a partnership be ended after publication?
Yes. A collaboration may be changed or ended when conditions, relevance or editorial requirements are no longer met.